3.  
When determining the scope of the audit and which activities of the organisation will be assessed during the audit, the privileges of the approved organisation should be taken into account, e.g. approval to carry out airworthiness reviews.

4.  
The competent authority auditing surveyor should always ensure that he/she is accompanied throughout the audit by a senior technical member of the organisation. Normally this is the quality manager. The reason for being accompanied is to ensure the organisation is fully aware of any findings during the audit.

5.  
The auditing surveyor should inform the senior technical member of the organisation at the end of the audit visit on all findings made during the audit.

AMC M.B.702 (e) Initial approval
1.  
Findings should be recorded on an audit report form with a provisional categorisa-tion as a level 1 or 2. Subsequent to the audit visit that identified the particular find-ings, the competent authority should review the provisional finding levels, adjusting them if necessary and change the categorisation from ‘provisional’ to ‘confirmed’.

2.  
All findings should be confirmed in writing to the applicant organisation within 2 weeks of the audit visit.

3.  
There may be occasions when the competent authority finds situations in the appli-cant’s organisation on which it is unsure about compliance. In this case, the organi-sation should be informed about possible non-compliance at the time and the fact that the situation will be reviewed within the competent authority before a decision is made. If the review concludes that there is no finding then a verbal confirmation to the organisation will suffice.

AMC M.B.702 (f) Initial approval (*)
1.  
The audit report form should be the EASA Form 13 (appendix VII).

2.  
A quality review of the EASA Form 13 audit report should be carried out by a compe-tent independent person nominated by the competent authority. The review should take into account the relevant paragraphs of M.A. Subpart G, the categorisation of finding levels and the closure action taken. Satisfactory review of the audit form should be indicated by a signature on the EASA Form 13.

AMC M.B.702 (g) Initial approval
The audit reports should include the date each finding was cleared together with refer-ence to the competent authority report or letter that confirmed the clearance.
Section B
PART-M
Subpart G
* see Appendices to Part M – Appendix VII to AMC M.B.702(f)

M.B.703 Issue of approval
(a)
The competent authority shall issue to the applicant an EASA Form 14 approval cer-tificate (Appendix VI) which includes the extent of approval, when the continuing airworthiness management organisation is in compliance with M.A. Subpart G.

(b)
The competent authority shall indicate the validity of the approval on the EASA Form 14 approval certificate.

(c)  
The reference number shall be included on the Form 14 approval certificate in a man-ner specified by the Agency.

(d)
In the case of commercial air transport, the information contained on an EASA Form 14 will be included on the air operator’s certificate.

AMC M.B.703 Issue of approval
The table shown for the Approval Schedule in EASA Form 14 includes a field designated as “Aircraft type/series/group”.
The intention is to give maximum flexibility to the competent authority to customise the approval to a particular organisation.
Possible alternatives to be included in this field are the following:
·  A specific type designation that is part of a type certificate, such as Airbus 340-211 or Cessna 172R. 
·  A type rating (or series) as listed in Part-66 Appendix I to AMC, which may be further subdivided, such as Boeing 737-600/700/800, Boeing 737-600, Cessna 172 Series. 
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(11)