曝光臺(tái) 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營(yíng)店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

which represent a third of all accidents in the
decade. Because of the three year average
3.0 Commercial Air Transport
Foreign registered
3-year average
EASA MS registered
3-year average
Linear (EASA MS registered
3-year average)
Linear (foreign registered
3-year average)
Other foreign registered
Cargo foreign registered
Passenger foreign registered
Number of accidents
Annual Safety Review 2008
Page 14
European aviation safety agency
Fi gur e 3-5
Accident categories for fatal
and non-fatal accidents — aeroplanes
registered in EASA MS (1999 – 2008)
10
8
4
2
6
10
Fi gur e 3-4
Fatal accidents by type of
operation — EASA MS
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
5
6
9
4
1
2
1
3 3
2
3
2 1
1
3
1
1
1
2
3
2
LALT
MAC
AMAN
TURB
GCOL
BIRD
CABIN
RI-VAP
FUEL
WSTRW
LOC-G
ARC
SEC
USOS
ADRM
F-NI
EVAC
ATM
OTHR
ICE
UNK
RAMP
RE
SCF-NP
F-POST
CFIT
SCF-PP
LOC-I
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Number of accidents
Other EASA MS
registered
Cargo EASA MS
registered
Passenger EASA MS
registered
Fatal accidents
Non-fatal accidents
Number of accidents
Your safety is our mission.
Page 15
Fi gur e 3-6
Rate of assigned accident categories
for fatal and non fatal accidents –
aeroplanes registered in EASA MS
16
8
4
12
20
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
commercial air transport flights appear to have
a declining proportion in the total number of
fatal accidents. Other commercial air transport
operations, such as air taxi or ferry flights, have
an increasing proportion of the total (category:
other). Almost a quarter of all accidents appear
to involve aircraft conducting operations
under this category. It is worth noting that the
proportion of accidents in this category is
significantly higher than the proportion of
aircraft conducting such operations.
Information on the number of aircraft and
the type of operations they are used for is not
provided in this safety review.
For EASA MS the accidents per type of
operation appear to be different, as shown in
Figure 3-4. The small number of accidents
makes the type of operation during which an
accident occurred an almost random
characteristic. However, despite the steadily
decreasing number of accidents, there is
a constant occurrence of accidents involving
passenger air transport operations.
3.1.4. Accident categories
The assignment of accidents under one or
multiple categories assists in identifying
particular safety issues. Fatal and non-fatal
accidents involving EASA MS registered aircraft
which occurred during commercial air
transport operations were assigned under
relevant accident categories. These categories
are based on the work (1) done by the CASTICAO
Common Taxonomy Team (CICTT).
Figure 3-5 shows the accident categories for
all accidents involving EASA MS registered
aircraft in the decade 1999 – 2008.
As shown in Figure 3-5, the categories
which included a high number of fatal accidents
were amongst others LOC-I (‘loss of control —
in flight’), SCF-PP (‘system or component failure
or malfunction related to the engine/
powerplant’) and CFIT (‘controlled flight into
terrain’).
Events assigned under LOC-I involve the
momentary or total loss of control of the
aircraft by the crew. This loss of control might
be the result of reduced aircraft performance
or because the aircraft was flown outside
its capabilities for control. SCF-PP involves the
malfunction of a single or multiple engines
due to the failure of a related component or
system.
An accident may be assigned more than
one category depending on the number of
factors contributing to the accident. Figure 3-6
shows that the categories with the highest rate
of accidents assigned are ARC (‘abnormal
3.0 Commercial Air Transport
ARC: Abnormal runway contact
SCF-NP: System/component
failure or malfunction
[non-powerplant]
RE: Runway excursion
CFIT: Controlled flight into or
toward terrain
RAMP: Ground handling
LOC-I: Loss of control – inflight
　
中國(guó)航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Annual Safety Review 2008(5)