曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

Case #34 Healthy aircraft, Pilot Control Inputs: Wheel, Pedal and Column
Case #35 Healthy aircraft, Pilot Control Inputs: Wheel, Pedal and Column
Case #36 Healthy aircraft, Pilot Control Inputs: Wheel, Pedal and Column
Case #37 Healthy aircraft, Pilot Control Inputs: Wheel, Pedal and Column
The results from the test indicated that for the scenarios that were flown with the
Horizontal Stabilizer Trim in the normal cruise position (4.61 units) would generally
produce a load factor higher than 2 G during the descent.
The scenarios flown with the Horizontal Stabilizer Trim in the manual electric forward
limit (2.5 units) would generally produce a load factor lower than 2 G during the descent.
G-6
This page is left intentionally blank.
Appendix H
Site Acceptance Certificate of
The Hughes GUARDIAN System
H-1
H-2
H-3
H-4
H-5
H-6
This page is left intentionally blank.
Appendix I
Professional Events in the Flight Crew’s Career during
1997
I-1
I-2
Professional Events in the Pilot-in-Command’s Career During 1997
18 February PIC attends base check. Performance rated as ‘above average’.
3 March PIC was flying pilot on a flight from Singapore to Manado,
Indonesia. During approach to runway 36, the crew conducted a goaround
manoeuvre.
8 April The PIC was selected as a line instructor pilot (LIP).
10 May The PIC commenced line operations as an LIP.
3 June The first officer on the 3 March flight was interviewed by the B737
Fleet Manager about the Manado incident.
6 June The B737 Fleet Manager interviewed and obtained written
statements from the PIC and the first officer on the 3 March flight,
and wrote an initial report. He recommended that further
investigation was required.
19 June The Flight Operation Manager re-interviewed both pilots involved in
the Manado incident (3 March).
24 June The PIC and the first officer on the 3 March Manado flight were
rostered to fly together. While preparing for the flight in the
flightdeck, the PIC had asked the first officer some questions about
the Manado incident.He then pulled the circuit breaker for the
cockpit voice recorder (CVR) in order to preserve the previous
conversation between the two pilots as evidence for the ongoing
investigation into the Manado incident. The PIC decided to reset the
circuit breaker before take off. The flight continued uneventfully.
25 June Both pilots on the 24 June flight reported the CVR circuit breaker
incident to management. The Flight Operations Manager decided to
conduct a Divisional Inquiry into the incident.
3 July The PIC was handed a letter summarizing the findings of the inquiry
panel into the circuit breaker incident. The PIC was also informed
that the company had decided to remove him from his LIP position
immediately, and he was reprimanded for his actions. Attached to the
letter was a form that asked the PIC whether or not he accepted the
company’s decision.
7 July The PIC returned the form attached to the 3 July letter, and stated
that he did not accept the company’s decision. As a result, a
Company Inquiry into the go-around and circuit breaker incidents
was held.
15 July The PIC was informed by letter that the Company Inquiry would
take place on 28 July.
28 July The Company Inquiry into the go-around and circuit breaker
incidents took place.
The panel recommended that the original penalty stands.
1 August The PIC was informed of the Company Inquiry’s decision by the
Flight Operations Manager. During this meeting, the PIC indicated
that he did not accept the decision and he inquired about further
I-3
avenues of appeal.
7 August The PIC completed a base check. Performance was rated ‘above
average’.
19 August The PIC had a meeting with the SilkAir General Manager about the
inquiries.
16 December The PIC last flight assignment was on this date
19 December Accident
I-4
Professional Events in the First Officer’s Career During 1997
3 March The F/O completed base check. Performance rated as “above
average”.
4 June The F/O was found fit during his last medical examination.
14 Sept. The F/O completed his most recent recurrent training (included
recovery from unusual attitude) and was found to be satisfactory.
15 Sept. The F/O completed base check. Performance rated as “above
average”.
10 October The F/O completed a line check, and no problems were noted.
16 December The F/O last flight assignment was on this date
19 December Accident
Appendix J
History of FAA AD Related to
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：NTSC Aircraft Accident Report SILKAIR FLIGHT MI 185 BOEING B(45)