曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

JETBROKERS’ MARKET UPDATE: APRIL 2005 5
AIRCRAFT TYPE D.O.C. RANGE N.M. TAS CABIN SIZE NUMBER MFG % FOR SALE PRICE RANGE
JETBROKERS AIRCRAFT COMPARISON: TURBOPROPS
CHEYENNE I/IA 705 1100 248 135 215 15% $.425 to $.850
CHEYENNE II 795 1385 250 135 410 15% $.200 to $.900
CHEYENNE IIXL 785 1280 270 155 81 7% $.850 to $1.1
CHEYENNE III 830 1150 280 215 89 22% $.675 to $1.0
CHEYENNE IIIA 830 1550 285 215 60 12% $.960 to $1.3
CHEYENNE 400LS 855 1500 335 224 44 22% $1.375 to $1.7
COMMANDER 690A/B 709 1400 279 184 542 12% $.325 to $1.3
COMMANDER 840 709 1780 284 184 122 7% $.795 to $1.1
COMMANDER 900 682 1700 282 250 42 12% $1.0 to $1.6
COMMANDER 980 652 2000 282 184 84 1% $.875 to $1.3
COMMANDER 1000 689 2000 301 250 110 8% $1.3 to $2.2
CONQUEST I 714 1275 266 159 236 9% $.790 to $1.6
CONQUEST II 665 1566 293 214 363 6% $.975 to $1.7
KING AIR A/B90 650 1100 220 178 388 13% $.125 to $.595
KING AIR C90 620 1100 215 178 516 16% $.100 to $1.495
KING AIR C90A/B 615 1120 247 178 639 8% $.760 to $2.5
KING AIR E90 778 1300 240 178 347 13% $.470 to $1.0
KING AIR F90 738 1100 260 178 236 9% $.750 to $1.4
KING AIR 100/A100 834 1200 235 256 246 13% $.400 to $1.2
KING AIR B100 757 1500 260 256 137 23% $.535 to $1.3
KING AIR 200 770 1600 275 256 893 11% $.550 to $2.3
KING AIR B200 766 1700 285 256 989 6% $1.095 to $3.8
KING AIR 300 786 1500 300 256 230 5% $1.4 to $2.15
KING AIR 350 816 1580 300 306 386 6% $2.075 to $5.2
MERLIN III 746 2060 270 251 89 13% $.250 to $.590
MERLIN IIIB/C 746 2060 295 251 109 17% $.450 to $.750
SOLITAIRE 785 1450 313 120 65 11% $.845 to $1.50
MARQUISE 795 1400 295 221 131 15% $.395 to $1.0
PIAGGIO AVANTI 775 1300 380 359 90 9% $4.5 to $6.0
74 WORLD AIRCRAFT SALES MAGAZINE – April 2005 www.AvBuyer.com Aircraft Index see Page 2

CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN (CFIT)
JOINT SAFETY ANALYSIS TEAM (JSAT)
Results and Analysis
September 1, 1998
Revision A, November 20, 1998
Page ii
REVISIONS
Revision A: November 20, 1998
Modified report for clarification and simplification. Clarified document purpose and
recommendations. Revised prioritization category definitions and method description.
Page iii
CONDUCTED BY THE
CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN JOINT SAFETY ANALYSIS
TEAM (CFIT JSAT)
THE SUBJECT JSAT WAS COMPOSED OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS:
1. Federal Aviation Administration:
* Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service (ANE)
* Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service (ANM)
* Flight Standards Service (AFS)
* Office of Accident Investigation (AAI)
* Air Traffic Service (AAT)
* Aviation Systems Standards (AVN)
2. The Boeing Company
3. Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA)
4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
5. Airbus Industrie
6. Air Transport Association (ATA)
Page iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary
II Team Members
III Acronyms
IV. Definitions
V. Introduction
VI. Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) Analysis
VII. Prioritized List of Interventions
VIII. Comparison with Results from Prior CFIT Studies
IX. Conclusion
X. Recommendations
XI. Footnotes
XII. Appendices
A: CFIT Joint Safety Analysis Team (JSAT) Charter
B. Data Set
C. Problem Statement by Accident Summary
D. CFIT Intervention Effectiveness and Feasibility Ratings
Page v
FIGURES
Figure 1
Most Common Problems
Page vi
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During the fall of 1997, the Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST), a combined
organization of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA), Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Air Transport
Association (ATA), and airplane and engine manufacturers dedicated to working together
to improve aviation safety, chartered a Joint Safety Analysis Team (JSAT). The JSAT
was tasked to develop, document, and utilize an analytical process to recommend safety
intervention strategies. The team was further tasked to validate the concept of a joint
industry/government task force, and to validate the developed process by review of
Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) data.
The JSAT reviewed 9 previously completed studies of CFIT accidents. The team also
performed a detailed analysis of 10 commercial CFIT accidents utilizing the JSAT
process found in the document entitled “Process for Conducting Joint Safety Analysis
Teams (JSAT’s)”. This process develops intervention strategies and a recommended
priority for implementation. The priority is based on the effectiveness of a proposed
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：航空資料33(59)