曝光臺(tái) 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專(zhuān)營(yíng)店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

In addition to these measures, H.R. 2649 calls for establishing no-fly zones during periods of high terrorist threat levels and any other applicable times identified by the DHS around all sensitive nuclear facilities, chemical facilities where a release of hazardous materials could endanger one million or more lives, and any other facilities designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security. 
On July 21, 2005, Representative Sweeney introduced the General Aviation Security Act of 2005 (H.R. 3397).  This bill would require all operators of public-and private-use airports in the United States to register with the DHS and undergo a registration renewal process every three years.  The proposed registration process would include a security plan documenting site-specific security procedures consistent with the TSA’s most recent security guidelines for GA airports.  In developing security plans, operators would be required to provide a written description of how the airport has addressed each recommendation or justify why a particular recommendation was not adopted.  The legislation calls for using self-assessment tools to identify airport characteristics for security purposes in the development of airport-specific security plans.  In addition to providing security plans to the DHS as part of the registration process, airports would also be required to submit their security plans to local law enforcement agencies having jurisdiction over the airport.
H.R. 3397 would also require that all public-use airports:
!  Ensure that all aircraft crews verify the identity of all aircraft
passengers; ! Maintain logs of all transient aircraft for a minimum of five years; ! Make a list of emergency telephone contacts available to all airport
personnel; ! Restrict the access of unlicensed individuals and student pilots to aircraft keys; ! Require aircraft renters to present government-issued identification in addition to their pilot’s license; ! Post applicable security warning signs and advisories where appropriate;
!  Provide emergency responders with confidential emergency locator maps of the airport identifying items such as runways, ramp areas, fence lines, and gates; and
!  Familiarize local law enforcement with the airport and consult with them in developing security procedures.
Additionally, at all GA airports – both public- and private-use – all aircraft would be required to be double-locked with one external lock and one lock inside the aircraft. Also, at all GA airports, hangars would be required to be locked when not in use and adequate fencing would be required for secure areas.
Besides these more comprehensive measures addressing GA security, concerns over airspace violations that complicate the task of protecting critical assets from aerial attack have prompted the introduction of legislation calling for stiffer fines for airspace violators and mandatory pilot training on airspace restrictions.  In response to concerns over frequent violations of restricted airspace near Washington, DC, Representative Blunt introduced the Capitol Airspace Enforcement Act (H.R. 3465). The bill calls for civil penalties ranging from $10,000 up to $100,000 for violations of the 15-mile radius flight restricted zone (FRZ) around Washington, DC, and fines of up to $5,000 for violations of security protocols while operating in the larger air defense identification zone (ADIZ).  The measure also includes a requirement for mandatory pilot training regarding the airspace restrictions and proper operating procedures and compliance with airspace restrictions. 
　
中國(guó)航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Securing General Aviation(43)