曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

1.5 HOW TO USE THE MANUAL
1.5.1 This section outlines how different target audiences can use the manual depending on whether their purpose is in line with the primary or secondary goal outlined in paragraph 1.3 above.
1.5.2 Organizations providing flight procedure designer training (training providers)
1.5.2.1 Organizations providing flight procedure designer training, such as independent training providers and State authorities/procedure design services providers that provide training for their own procedure designers,  can use the manual to:
.
complete the job and task analysis with the competency framework as a starting point;

.
develop training courses/programmes; and

.
evaluate training courses/programmes.

1.5.2.2 Once job and task analysis is completed, training providers can apply the method described in Chapter 2.  It should be noted that competency requirements for flight procedure designers can vary among States.
1.5.2.3 Developing a training course/programme includes several steps such as:
.
determining prerequisites;

.
determining training objectives (terminal objectives, enabling objectives, OJT objectives); . organizing modules; and

.
developing tests.

 

1.5.3 Regulators
1.5.3.1 Regulators that intend to approve/certify a training course/programme can use this manual as a part of their approval/certification of training process.  For instance, they can establish standards which state that: “The proposed training shall be developed, implemented and evaluated in accordance with a competency-based approach.  Application of such an approach is described in ,the Flight Procedure Designer Training Manual (Doc xxxx)”.
1.5.3.2 However, it should be noted that this use of the manual is not its primary goal.

1.5.4 Organizations that dispatch procedure designers to training providers
1.5.4.1 Organizations that dispatch procedure designers to training providers can evaluate the training course/programme by checking if the course/training has been developed using a competency-based approach as described in this manual. Curriculum and material of well-developed training must adequately cover the competency elements in the procedure designer competency framework.
1.5.4.2 However, it should be noted that this use of the manual is not its primary goal.

 

1.6 USE OF AUTOMATION

1.6.1 Procedure design automated tools have the potential to greatly reduce errors, save time and provide for standardized application of criteria.  For this reason, States are encouraged to use software packages to design instrument flight procedures.
1.6.2 It should be emphasized however, that the use of automated tools (whether a hand calculator, a spreadsheet or fully automated software) does not waive the requirement for the designer to meet the competency standards as set out in the competency framework.  Procedure design tools can sometimes have spurious results especially after revisions in code, database updates or simply the proverbial ‘garbage in – garbage out’ scenario.  It must be emphasized that automated design tools provide assistance to the designer but that the designer must at all times be vigilant of the automated results. It is the designer who is ultimately responsible for the validity of the procedure design regardless whether it is produced manually or by software.  Moreover, it is the designer’s responsibility to ensure that all stakeholder requirements are met within the design.  For these reasons, procedure designers must maintain high competency in criteria application and an awareness of the ‘big picture’ results of any design.
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：飛行程序設計質量保證手冊(12)