曝光臺 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

(c). in-flight surveys, as deemed necessary by the competent authority.
2.  The competent authority should undertake regular sample product surveys of aircraft on its register to verify that:
(a). the condition of an aircraft as sampled is to a standard acceptable for the Certificate of Airworthiness to remain in force,
(b). the operator/Owner’s management of the airworthiness of their aircraft is effec-tive,
(c). satisfactory levels of continued airworthiness are being achieved,
(d). the approval and licenses granted to organisations and persons continue to be applied in a consistent manner to achieve the required standards.
AMC M.B.303 (c) Aircraft continuing airworthiness monitoring
Each competent authority should create an annual programme of surveys, selecting air-craft and/or operators depending on local knowledge of the maintenance environment, operating conditions, airworthiness standards and past surveillance experience. The programme should be used to identify the operator/fleet/aircraft, which are causing the greatest concern.
* see Appendices to Part M – Appendix III to AMC M.B.303(d) 176
AMC M.B.303 (d) Aircraft continuing airworthiness monitoring
1.  
Appendix III to this AMC is an example format for an annual in depth survey pro-gramme. A sample of the 14 key risk airworthiness elements identified on the exam-ple should be assessed during each survey and the survey should include the aircraft as the product sample. The survey should be a ‘deep cut’ through the elements or systems selected and all findings should be recorded. Surveyors/inspectors in con-junction with the owners, operators and maintenance organisations should identify the root cause of each confirmed finding.

2.  
In addition, an annual ramp survey programme should be developed based on geo-graphical locations, taking into account airfield activity, and focusing on key issues that can be surveyed in the time available without unnecessarily delaying the aircraft.

3.  
Surveyors/inspectors should be satisfied that the root cause found and the corrective actions taken are adequate to correct the deficiency and to prevent re-occurrence.

4.  
Where the aircraft continuing airworthiness monitoring survey visit can be linked to the oversight of an approved organisation then credit can be taken in the monitoring process of that approved organisation.

Section B
PART-M
Subpart C

M.B.304 Revocation, suspension and limitation
The competent authority shall:
(a)
suspend an airworthiness review certificate on reasonable grounds in the case of potential safety threat, or;

(b)
suspend, revoke or limit an airworthiness review certificate pursuant to M.B.303(g).

 

SUBPART E
COMPONENTS

(to be developed as appropriate)

AMC M.B.602 (a) Initial approval

1.  ‘Formally indicate in writing’ means that an EASA Form 4 (appendix X) should be used for this activity. With the exception of the accountable manager, an EASA Form 4 should be completed for each person nominated to hold a position required by
M.A.606 (b)
2.  In the case of the accountable manager approval of the maintenance organisation manual containing the accountable manager’s signed commitment statement consti-tutes formal acceptance.
AMC M.B.602 (b) Initial approval
The competent authority should indicate approval of the maintenance organisation manual in writing.
AMC M.B.602 (c) Initial approval
1.  
The competent authority should determine by whom, and how the audit shall be conducted. For example, it will be necessary to determine whether one large team audit or a short series of small team audits or a long series of single man audits are most appropriate for the particular situation.

　
中國航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS – PART M 2(6)