曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

Hazard of the product as a whole
In the available MSDS it is stated that the “Worksafe classification” of Mobil Jet Oil II is ‘not hazardous by Worksafe criteria’.43
3.42 In its submission, Mobil Oil Australia Ltd responded to the NICNAS document by stating:
We are concerned that the lack of context for these toxicological profiles may result in the Secretariat [of this Committee] (or members of the public who otherwise review the document) concluding that the product displays certain health and safety risks, when in fact it does not. When the product is viewed as a whole, MJO is not a hazardous material as classified pursuant to the National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (NOHSC) Work Safe criteria … Also, scientific studies, including the recent work by Macker et. al. … demonstrate that exposure to jet oils does not pose a significant risk to human health.44
3.43 The Mobil Oil submission went on to set out a number of “specific concerns with respect to the presentation of information in the Overview” document prepared by NICNAS, namely the presentation of a ‘misleading picture of potential health and safety hazards associated with Mobil Jet Oil II”.45
3.44 Later in its submission the company stated:
… we believe the Overview could lead to undue public concern due to the statement regarding the presence of potential carcinogens in the product. In fact, these constituents are present as impurities only at trace levels and below the level at which an adverse health effect could occur.46
3.45 In a supplementary submission to this inquiry Mobil noted that:
We do not believe that Mobil jet turbine oils pose any significant toxicological risk to individuals accidentally exposed to aerosols or vapours in aircraft cabins. Such exposures are not what we would refer to as "normal use” but the cabin levels that can be reached during such exposures are comprehended by our internal and published risk assessments and are considered safe. These assessments are based on Mobil toxicology testing as well as the extensive toxicology database found in the published literature.47
3.46 In response to specific claims that Mobil Oil II is toxic the company stated:
43  Submission 12, NICNAS, pp 3-11 
44  Submission 13, Mobil Oil Australia Ltd, p 1 
45  Submission 13, Mobil Oil Australia Ltd, pp 1-2 
46  Submission 13, Mobil Oil Australia Ltd, p 2 
47  Submission13A, Mobil Oil Australia Ltd, p 2 

… based on the toxicological data developed over the years, Mobil Jet Oil II is a non-hazardous product based on the NOHSC document "Approved Criteria for Classifying Hazardous Substances”. …
With regard to phenyl-napthylamine, Mobil Jet Oil II contains approximately 1% of the alpha isomer. Testing has confirmed that this concentration did not cause sensitization in animals or humans. The concentration of the carcinogenic beta isomer and beta naphthylamine which might be present as impurities is negligible to non-existent in Mobil let Oil II…. 48
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Air Safety and Cabin Air Quality in the BAe 146 Aircraft(42)