曝光臺(tái) 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專(zhuān)營(yíng)店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

10  Submission 14B, AFAP, p 27
4.12 In a supplementary submission to the inquiry British Aerospace attached a copy of a report titled “Air Quality Testing Aboard Ansett Airlines BAe 146 Aircraft” dated 25 November 1997 prepared by Richard Fox of Allied Signal Aerospace. This report contained the following statement:
Generally, levels of VOCs in the air supplied to the cabin are very low, when compared with other models of aircraft in use. Contamination originating in the aircraft air-supply system is similar to that seen in airframes of other manufacturing origin.11
4.13 The Richard Fox report went on to advise:
The quality of the supply of air for the cabin and cockpit is within safety limits. Based on the filter analysis, there is no evidence to back claims of triorthocresyl phosphate exposure. 12
4.14 During evidence to the inquiry Mr Bill Black of British Aerospace commented:
The additional testing, which has been done by Richard Fox of Allied Signal and by Van Netten for Air BC, have provided additional sampling and additional evidence. They all conclude conclusively that there is no evidence whatsoever of harmful chemicals in the cabin of the BAe 146.13
4.15 In relation to the reference to Professor van Netten, the Committee notes evidence quoted earlier in the report that no such conclusions could be drawn from Professor Van Netten’s research which he considered had been selectively quoted.14
4.16 The Committee also notes evidence from Dr Winder, which argues that the testing upon which BA and the airlines base their arguments - that there is no presence of dangerous levels of chemicals in cabin air - are inadequate for a variety of reasons including:
.  
no tests have been performed at altitude during serious leak incidents;

.  
no clinical tests have been performed on affected crew immediately following serious leak incidents; and

.  
testing equipment is not sensitive enough to detect the isomers, which may be harmful to human health.15

11  Report by Allied Signal Aerospace, Air Quality Testing Aboard Ansett Airlines BAe 146 Aircraft, 25 November 1997 p 7, set out in Submission 11A, British Aerospace.
12  Report by Allied Signal Aerospace, Air Quality Testing Aboard Ansett Airlines BAe 146 Aircraft, 25 November 1997 p 10-12, set out in Submission 11A, British Aerospace.
13  British Aerospace, Evidence, 2 November 1999, p 89
14  See paragraph 2.83
15  Associate Professor Chris Winder, Evidence, 1 November 1999, p 15
4.17 The Committee notes that Ansett contests the assertion that their equipment is not sensitive enough. The committee inspected the equipment at Ansett’s Occupational Health and Safety Centre in Melbourne. The Committee is appreciative of the cooperation of Ansett at every point with the Inquiry and of their willingness to make equipment and senior staff available.
　
中國(guó)航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Air Safety and Cabin Air Quality in the BAe 146 Aircraft(53)