曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

therefore no separate EUROCONTROL cost-base
or unit rate as such, the Agency is very conscious
of the cost pressures to which users are subject.
1. Cost of Part I: EATMP, CFMU, EEC, IANS,
PRU, SRU, RU and Support Services
EUROCONTROL costs (Part I) represent some
7% of the total en-route costs.
The trend in EUROCONTROL抯 charges to the
airspace users is measured by the two following
variables:
 the cost per kilometre overflown (which is
the approach adopted by the Performance
Review Unit).
The EUROCONTROL cost per kilometre represents
around 5 euro cents per kilometre overflown.
It has to be underlined that, in nominal
terms, 2003 costs remain at the level of 1996
while, in real terms, 2003 costs represent only
88% of those of 1996.
 the cost per service unit (being the combination
of distance and aircraft weight used for
charging purpose).
The cost per service unit in 2003 is forecast to
be EUR 4.37 per service unit charged in the
Route Charges System. The cost in 2003 would
represent, in real terms, about 90% of that of
1996.
Cost per establishment in 2002 (PART I)
EEC
19%
18%
Support
Services
CFMU
24%
IANS
4%
Other
3%
EATMP
32%
10%
60%
Staff
costs
Operating
costs
Depreciation
26%
Interest
4%
Cost breakdown by type in 2002 (PART I)
106 - 107 I Financial Information
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Evolution of total costs (Part I) in EUR ?00
Staff costs (gross)
Operating costs
Depreciation
Interest
Total EUROCONTROL cost
% i/i-1
Total en-route costs
%i/i-1
Part of EUROCONTROL
1996
232,919
2,952,354
7.9%
1997
168,683
27,448
46,945
17,001
260,077
11.7%
3,590,179
21.6%
7.2%
1998
166,070
23,102
59,329
17,190
265,691
2.2%
3,851,008
7.3%
6.9 %
1999
175,578
18,789
69,915
14,726
279,008
5.0%
4,213,444
9.4%
6.6 %
2000
195,636
22,173
81,162
16,604
315,575
13.1%
4,501,196
6.8 %
7.0 %
2001
204,982
33,642
79,246
14,046
331,916
5.2 %
4,826,986
7.2 %
6.9 %
2002
218,520
35,320
96,866
12,821
363,527
9.5%
4,918,849
1.9%
7.4%
2003
236,214
36,639
85,369
15,052
373,274
2.8%
5,441,682
10.63%
6.9%
Evolution of costs per kms (Part I)
Total EUROCONTROL cost
(EUR ?00)
Total kilometres flown (million)
Nominal unit cost (EUR/km)
Deflation factor applied
Real unit cost (EUR1996/km)
1996
232,919
4,122
0.0565
0.0565
1997
260,077
5,018
0.0518
1.7%
0.0509
1998
265,691
5,567
0.0477
1.3%
0.0463
1999
279,008
6,099
0.0457
1.2%
0.0439
2000
315,575
6,435
0.0490
2.1%
0.0460
2001
331,916
6,448
0.0515
2.1%
0.0473
2002
363,527
6,415
0.0566
2.2%
0.0508
2003
373,274
6,600
0.566
2.1%
0.0498
(forecast)
(forecast)
Evolution of costs per service unit (Part I)
Total cost
(EUR ?00)
Total number of service units
(million)
Nominal cost (EUR/service unit)
Deflation factor applied
Real unit cost
(EUR1996/ service unit)
1996
232,919
54.5
4.27
4.27
1997
260,077
65.0
4.00
1.7%
3.94
1998
265,691
71.0
3.74
1.3%
3.63
1999
279,008
77.9
3.58
1.2%
3.44
2000
315,575
82.4
3.83
2.1%
3.60
2001
331,916
82.5
4.02
2.1%
3.70
2002
363,527
82.0
4.43
2.2%
3.99
2003
373,274
85.5
4.37
2.1%
3.85
(forecast)
Financial Information . . .
EUROCONTROL COSTS (cont抎)
2. Cost of Part III - Maastricht UAC
In accordance with ICAO rules, the 4 Member
States include their own share of the Maastricht
UAC costs in their individual cost-base.
3. Cost of Part VI - CEATS
So far, there has been no cost-base for CEATS.
CEATS Member States include in their own
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：EUROCONTROL Annual Report 2002(54)