曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

pilot over-ride must be provided.
· To maintain pilot authority over the management of engine thrust, reduction of the
maximum attainable engine thrust must not be made for merely economic
considerations. Although normal maximum available thrust may be set to a particular
determined value, a method to over-ride this restriction and obtain maximum thrust
available consistent with aerodynamic and controllability issues must be provided.
· Further research and development should be conducted to optimize flight envelope
protection control laws and design features with emphasis on providing pilot override
authority.
· Research should be conducted on a g limiting system that takes into account current
weight, Mach, airspeed, and CG, and varies the aircraftÕs g capability accordingly.
· A320/A330/A340 operators should use the manufacturers recommended full aft stick
CFIT recovery procedure.
· B-777 operators should use the manufacturerÕs recovery procedure.
Revision 14.0 28
Appendix A
Effects Of Additional Thrust On Windshear Recovery
Evaluation of Engine Effects on
Takeoff Performance in Windshear
using the A-320 Simulator
Harry Walker
United Airlines
17 Jan 1999
Revision 14.0 29
I. Overview
This test was conducted as an evaluation of the effects of two different engine models on the
performance of the A-320 during the takeoff event with windshear. Of interest was the
performance in respect to altitude loss, airspeed decay, and time to climb out of the windshear
area. The two different engine models were the PW 2522 engine and the PW 2524 engine.
II. Equipment Description
The evaluation was conducted on the A-320 simulator number one at UAL DENTK. It
contained all aero models for the A-320 as well as being fleet representative of the current
UAL fleet. The engines were simulated using power management tables (attach 1) for the PW
2522 (V2522-AS) and the PW 2524 (V2524-AS). Simulator engineer Jason Hartman (UAL)
incorporated these models into the UAL simulation in lieu of the standard engine models.
These new power models were used to simulate the engine configurations of the A-319. The
PW 2522 produces approximately 2200lbs of thrust per engine and the PW 2524 produces
approximately 2400lbs of thrust per engine.
III. Data Acquisition
F/O Harry Walker (test pilot), Capt. Jef Fleener (previously an A-320 Capt. at UAL), and
Capt. Dennis Taylor (UAL 737-300 Capt.) conducted the evaluation. The simulator was
placed at a representative gross weight (approx. 160,000 lbs.) and in position on the runway.
A normal takeoff was performed and the autopilot was engaged shortly after the gear was
retracted. All data were collected using the standard operating procedure as printed in the
UAL A-320 flight manual pg. 6-217 (attach 2). Test conditions were standard day, gear up
prior to windshear, flaps 1. Windshear models 2 and 4 were used. Model 2 has a windshear
event occur at approximately 55 feet AGL. Windshear model 4 has the windshear event occur
at approximately 550 feet AGL. Four event sets were flown. Set one with the PW 2522
engine, windshear model 4. Set Two was with the PW 2524 windshear model 4. Set Three
was with the PW 2522 engine with windshear model 2. Set Four was with the PW 2524
engine with windshear model 2. Once windshear was detected (start of airspeed loss) the
TO/GA button was pushed and the throttles pushed to maximum and held there to eliminate
any autotthrottle tendencies to reduce thrust. The autopilot was disengaged, pitch attitude
rotated toward 17.5 and SRS guidance was used. Speed brakes were confirmed retracted and
flight path was controlled to follow SRS command bars. The simulator windshear recoverytraining
program automatically generated data at attachment 3.
IV. Findings / Results
During the windshear model 4 events the PW 2522 engine configuration had on average a 495
ft altitude loss, an airspeed loss of 54.5 KIAS, and spent 51.75 seconds in the event. The PW
2524 engine configuration had an average 395 ft loss, an airspeed loss of 41.5 KIAS, and spent
51.25 seconds in the event.
Revision 14.0 30
During the windshear model 2 event the PW 2522 engine configuration had on average a 185 ft
altitude loss, an airspeed loss of 37.75 KIAS loss and spent 32.5 seconds in the event. The
PW 2524 engine configuration had an average 120 ft altitude loss, a 42.75 KIAS loss and spent
34.25 seconds in the event.
Windshear Model 4 Windshear Model 2
Averages PW 2522 PW 2524 PW 2522 PW 2524
Alt Loss 495ft 395 ft 185 ft 120 ft
Airspeed Loss 54.5 KIAS 41.5 KIAS 37.75 KIAS 42.75 KIAS
Time in Event 51.75 Sec 51.25 Sec 32.5 Sec 34.25 Sec
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：航空資料16(26)