曝光臺 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

must be filed with the FAA before beginning construction or alteration; add and amend definitions for
terms commonly used during the aeronautical evaluation process; and remove the provisions for public
hearings and antenna farms. Lastly, the FAA proposes to re-title the rule and reformat it into sections
that closely reflect the aeronautical study process. These proposals incorporate case law and legislative
action, and simplify the rule language. The intended effect of these proposed changes is to improve
safety and promote the efficient use of the National Airspace System.
In a AAAE conference call, Bob Bonnani [FAA Airport Obstructions Standards Committee] advised that
the NPRM does not address changes to airspace or the “one-engine in-op” surfaces. The primary
objective of the NPRM is to harmonize the Part 77 surfaces with TERPS. Their next steps are to lay out
an implementation plan for the Deputy Administrator’s consideration which will include several options.
AAAE requested comments on the NPRM from airports and have submitted a consolidated response to
the FAA.
NEPA Modernization and Cat X’s
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) established a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Task Force and is now implementing recommendations designed to modernize the implementation of
NEPA and to make the process more effective and efficient. The proposed guidance was developed to
assist agencies with developing and using categorical exclusions for actions that do not have significant
effects on the human environment and eliminate the need for unnecessary paperwork and effort for
actions that normally do not warrant formal environmental review and analyses. CEQ requested
comments on the proposal prior to issuing final guidance to the heads of Federal agencies. AAAE
Regulatory Affairs subsequently requested comments be submitted to them by October 20, 2006.
FAA Directive on Friction Testing
FAA Legal advised FAA against proceeding with Operations Specification “CO-82”. As such FAA will
pursue a more traditional NPRM approach. Many airports had expressed concerns with the FAA’s new
directive on friction testing including the need to correlate friction readings with actual braking conditions
as reported by pilots and capacity issues related to a proposed 15% rule. At a recent industry meeting,
there remained issues related to airport condition reporting and efforts will proceed to get verbal
agreements between interested parties before the onset of the winter season.
Potential Rulemaking on Requirements for ARFF Response
In October of 2005, an economist was assigned to study the issues involved in proposed new response
times. The tentative schedule for the rulemaking is outlined below. Many airports have stated that the
impacts would be significant but little coordinated quantitative assessment had been conducted. Impacts
could range from minimal to multi-station scenarios. At this point, it is unclear as to how the FAA would
implement the new regulations in terms of grandfathering older runways. Airports should be prepared for
a national initiative to quantify impacts to U.S. airports as a whole. Many airports also feel that any study
effort should not only quantify capital costs, but O&M costs and other ongoing costs associated with
staffing, etc. More information on the subject can be found at:
http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/arac/issue_areas/airport_cert/
􀂃 December 2005 through December 2007 -- Economic and Legal Analysis
􀂃 December 2007 -- sent back to ARAC
􀂃 Spring 2007 -- ARAC Issues Group approves document
􀂃 Winter 2007 -- FAA begins work on development of NPRM
AAAE OSP Committee Board Report Page 4 of 7
January 7-11, 2007
􀂃 Fall 2008 -- NPRM issued
􀂃 Winter 08/09 -- comments received
􀂃 Fall 2010/11 -- Final Document Issued
Web Based Applications for Airport Planning and Operations
There is a growing interest among airports and certain factions of the FAA in moving toward web based
applications for planning and operational uses. For example, web based Airport Layout Plans and
Airport Certification Manuals. The traditional hardcopy documents have become unwieldy and make use
by airport staff difficult. Web based systems can be designed to be available to most staff at an airport
with minimal to no training. For example, interactive Airport Layout Plans (iALPs) are becoming more
widely used by airports such as Sea-Tac, Tampa and Miami Dade as well as FAA Regional ADOs.
While much work remains before the FAA can accept them as “official” ALPs, the groundwork continues
to be developed for a move in that direction.
　
中國航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：航空資料23(59)