曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

ANNEX 2 National Supplements
APPENDIX 1 Current Operations at today's Airports
Appendix 1 provides examples of Boeing 747 current operations at today’s
aerodromes and extracts from databases (without analyses, modifications
or extrapolations)
APPENDIX 2 Physical Characteristics of A380 Family Aircraft
Appendix 2 contains A380 basic physical characteristics (including wing
span and outer main gear wheel span)
APPENDIX 3 Performance of A380 Family Aircraft
Appendix 3 focuses on A380 specific performance and handling qualities
in flight
APPENDIX 4 Studies, Analyses, Working Papers and Reports
Appendix 4 provides available documentation pertaining to aircraft
operations
APPENDIX 5 Safety Analyses of Airfield Items
Appendix 5 develops the safety analyses that lead to the AACG
conclusions
3
I. Introduction
I.1. AACG Terms of Reference
The AACG is an informal group, consisting of a number of European Aviation Authorities, Airport
and Industry representatives.
It was formed to agree and promote a common position among the group members on the
application of ICAO requirements, with respect to the A380 aircraft, for infrastructure and
operations at existing major European airports that currently do not meet the requirements.
Recognising that the ideal for A380 operations would be to provide a level of aerodrome
infrastructure at least equal to the generic ICAO Requirements (contained within ICAO Annexes
and ADM), the AACG should, in particular:
- Agree and promote that any deviations from these ICAO Requirements should be
supported by appropriate aeronautical studies and relevant risk analyses;
- Report its work and findings to ICAO through the appropriate channels so that the
latter may use such data for the development of future provisions and enable the work
of the group to be disseminated globally;
- Seek to promote the application of the agreed lesser requirements for the A380
aircraft within national regulatory frameworks; and
- Co-operate with other international organisations and working groups dealing with
NLA operations.
I.2. Purpose of the document
The purpose of common agreement document is:
Ø to list the items of aerodrome infrastructure that may be affected by the introduction of
the Airbus A380 aircraft;
Ø to examine the ICAO Recommended Practices relating to those items;
Ø to show the level of compliance of an aerodrome’s infrastructure with those
recommendations; and
Ø for those areas of non-compliance, to show appropriate mitigation, if required,
proposed by the AACG to ensure the safe operation of the A380 aircraft at
aerodromes currently unable to meet ICAO Code F Aerodrome Standards and
Recommendations
Ø The AACG emphasises its position as an informal group proposing recommendations
to the relevant authorities. However, it is stressed that the authority to approve any
deviation from ICAO Requirements shall rest solely with the state having jurisdiction
over the aerodrome.
Ø No provision contained herein shall be construed so as to have a binding effect on any
such Authority with the respect to the approval of any such deviation.
4
I.3. Primary conditions of application
a) The A380 requirements discussed and agreed by the AACG and listed in this document apply
only to the Airbus A380 Family as defined in Appendix 2. The wingspan of the A380 aircraft
should be less than 80m and the outer main wheel span should be less than 14.4m.
b) The application of the different level of aerodrome infrastructure recommendations for A380
operations compared to code F is subject to:
·  For runway width and runway separations items (§III.2 & §III.4), the A380 aircraft being
certified to operate on a runway of Code E (minimum 45m) width for each type of
operation (autoland, flight director and manual modes).
·  For taxiway separations items (§III.5), where reduced margins exist compared to Code F
recommendations, proper guidance such as centre line lights or equivalent guidance (e.g.
marshaller, etc.) to be provided for night, or low visibility operations.
It may be permissible to operate with lower separation margins than agreed in this
document if an aeronautical study taking into account local conditions indicates that such
lower margins would not adversely affect the safety or significantly affect the regularity of
operations of the A380.
c) Aerodromes intending to handle aircraft operations requiring Code F facilities as specified in
Annex 14 Volume 1 may, with approval of the appropriate authority, provide the inferior
facilities specified in this document for the operation of A380 aircraft. However, facilities
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：航空資料23(63)