曝光臺(tái) 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營(yíng)店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

An approval will be evidenced by the signature of the
approving official, the issuance of a document or certificate, or
some other formal action taken by the State.
2.1.3 An acceptance does not necessarily require an
active response by the State to a matter submitted for its
review. A State may accept a matter submitted to it for review
as being in compliance with the applicable standards if the
State does not specifically reject all or a portion of the matter
under review, usually after some defined period of time after
submission.
2.1.4 The phrase “approved by the State” or similar
phrases using the word “approval” are frequently used in
Annex 6, Part I. Provisions indicating a review and implying
approval or at least “acceptance” by the State occur even more
frequently in Annex 6, Part I. In addition to these specific
phrases, Annex 6, Part I, contains numerous references to
requirements which would, as a minimum, create the need for
at least a technical review by the State. This Attachment groups
and outlines those specific Standards and Recommended Practices
for ease of use by States.
2.1.5 The State should make or arrange for a technical
safety evaluation before issuing the approval or acceptance.
The evaluation should:
a) be accomplished by a person with specific qualifications
to make such a technical evaluation;
b) be in accordance with written, standardized methodology;
and
c) where necessary to safety, include a practical demonstration
of the air operator’s actual ability to conduct
such an operation.
2.2 Demonstrations before
issuance of some approvals
2.2.1 Standard 4.2.1.4 obligates the State of the Operator,
prior to certification of an operator, to require sufficient
demonstrations by the operator to enable the State to evaluate
the adequacy of the operator’s organization, method of control
and supervision of flight operations, ground handling and
maintenance arrangements. These demonstrations should be in
addition to the review or inspections of manuals, records,
facilities and equipment. Some of the approvals required by
Annex 6 — Operation of Aircraft Part I
12/31/111//0016 ATT F-2
No. 30
Annex 6, Part I, such as approval for Category III operations,
have significant safety implications and should be validated by
demonstration before the State approves such operations.
2.2.2 While the specific methodology and extent of the
required demonstrations and evaluations vary between States,
the certification processes of States whose operators have good
safety records are generally consistent. In these States, technically
qualified inspectors evaluate a representative sample of
the actual training, maintenance and operations prior to the
issuance of an AOC or additional authorizations to the AOC.
2.3 Recording of certification actions
2.3.1 It is important that the certification, approval and
acceptance actions of the State are adequately documented. The
State should issue a written instrument, such as a letter or formal
document, as an official record of the action. These written
instruments should be retained as long as the operator continues
to exercise the authorizations for which the approval or acceptance
action was issued. These instruments are unambiguous
evidence of the authorizations held by an operator and provide
proof in the event that the State and the operator disagree on the
operations that the operator is authorized to conduct.
2.3.2 Some States collect certification records such as
inspections, demonstrations, approvals and acceptance instruments
into a single file which is retained as long as the operator
is active. Other States retain these records in files
according to the certification action performed, and revise the
file as the approvals or acceptance instruments are updated.
Regardless of the method used, these certification records are
persuasive evidence that a State is complying with its ICAO
obligations regarding operator certification.
2.4 Coordination of operations and
airworthiness evaluations
Some of the references to approval or acceptance in Annex 6,
Part I, will require an operations evaluation and an airworthiness
evaluation. Low minima approvals for the conduct of
Category II and III ILS approaches, for example, require
coordinated prior evaluation by operations and airworthiness
specialists. Flight operations specialists should evaluate the
operational procedures, training and qualifications. Airworthiness
specialists should evaluate the aircraft, equipment reliability
　
中國(guó)航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：an06_P1_8ed_amend_30(43)