曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

! Ensure commitment to the program.
! Manage goals, objectives and schedule.
! Monitor the “working together rules,” act as arbitrator.
! Manage external communication.
! Ensure timely completion of the program and publication of this final report.
The leadership team met 11 times over the last three years and is responsible for monitoring
progress, exchanging results among working groups, and providing direction for the program.
AFSSP Leadership Team
Airbus
AWG
BAE SYSTEMS
AWG
Boeing
AWG
Bombardier
AWG
Fokker
AWG
Lockheed
Martin AWG
2.0 Overview (continued)
Page 10 Industry AFFSP Report August 4, 2000
2.4.3 Airplane Working Groups
There are presently six airplane working groups (AWG) representing the manufacturers as noted
above. The AWGs are responsible for the following activities:
! Planning and scheduling of airplane inspection programs.
! Creation of inspection documents (e.g., service bulletins).
! Validation of inspection documents (e.g., lead airline process).
! Collection and analysis of inspection data.
! Review of past service records, findings, and reports.
! Assessment of the effectiveness of current maintenance practices.
! Recommendations for follow-on actions.
! Inputs to the final report.
Each manufacturer is the focal for its AWG and is responsible for coordinating these activities
with its member airlines. The following diagram outlines the process that the AWGs incorporated
into their individual fuel-system safety programs.
Figure 2-4: The AWG Process
Initially, the airplane working groups were tasked to conduct a historical review of operator and
manufacturer data related to fuel system findings. This review provided a list of “lessons learned”
that could be applied in the design reviews and development of maintenance or operating
instruction enhancements. Generally, a review of design principles and manufacturing processes
was performed to develop or validate the inspection instructions for each model addressed by the
AWG inspection programs.
Data review; look at
past history
- SDR
- Mfg. data
- Operator data
- Supplier data
Develop, issue, and
perform inspections
- Sample by A/P
type, age,
and operating
environment
Review design
principles and
manufacturing
processes
Review /verify
maintenance
and operating
programs / practices
2.0 Overview (continued)
August 4, 2000 Industry AFFSP Report Page 11
In preparing the fuel system inspection documents, each AWG addressed the following key areas:
! Integrity of wiring and bonding straps.
! Condition of fuel quantity indication system wiring and components.
! Condition of fuel pumps, fuel lines, and fittings.
! Electrical bonding and grounding of fuel system equipment.
! Inspection for foreign object debris.
! General tank condition.
Subsequent sections of this document present reports by the various AWGs established by the
participating manufacturers. These sections provide additional information on the FSSLT
composition, the inspection approach, and the inspected airplane type families. Included in these
reports are statistics about the inspection process, the actual inspection results, and actions that
have been or are being taken as a result of the inspection findings.
2.5 Industry Inspection Results
As of June 1, 2000, AFSSP inspections had been performed on 990 airplanes built by seven
different manufactures (Boeing and McDonnell Douglas were of course separate OEMs for type
design and manufacture). These airplanes are flown by 160 air carriers in diverse operating
environments on six different continents. A small number of additional inspections remain to be
accomplished and are planned for completion in 2000.
The following table summarizes the airplanes inspected:
Aircraft type Inspected Remaining Aircraft type Inspected Remaining
Airbus A300 /A310 90 0 Boeing 757 80 0
Airbus A320 /A321 24 0 Boeing 767 57 0
Airbus A330 /A340 19 0 Bombardier Dash-7 / -8 18 4
BAE HS 748 /ATP 11 0 Bombardier CRJ 12 0
BAE J 31/J32 14 0 Fokker F27/F50/F60 9 13
BAE J 41 15 0 Fokker F 28 / F 70 / F100 33 11
BAE 146 / Avro RJ 29 0 Lockheed Martin L-1011 6 0
Boeing 727 15 0 McD’ll Douglas DC-9 6 0
Boeing 737 97 3 McD’ll Douglas MD-80 5 0
Boeing 747 440 0 McD’ll D. DC-10 /MD-11 10 0
As of June 1, 2000. Industry total: 990 31
Figure 2-5: AFSSP Airplane Inspections in the World Fleet
2.0 Overview (continued)
Page 12 Industry AFFSP Report August 4, 2000
This AFSSP large-scale sampling inspection of the world fleet produced the following findings.
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：航空資料3(64)