曝光臺(tái) 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專(zhuān)營(yíng)店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

6.5.1.3 In case of a MSG-3 based maintenance programme, the reliability programme should provide a monitor that all MSG-3 related tasks from the maintenance programme are effective and their periodicity is adequate.
6.5.2 Identification of items. 
The items controlled by the programme should be stated, e.g. by ATA Chapters. Where some items (e.g. aircraft structure, engines, APU) are controlled by separate programmes, the associated procedures (e.g. individual sampling or life development programmes, constructor’s structure sampling programmes) should be cross referenced in the programme. 
6.5.3 Terms and definitions. 
The significant terms and definitions applicable to the programme should be clearly identified. Terms are already defined in MSG-3, CAR-145 and CAR-M. 
6.5.4 Information sources and collection. 
6.5.4.1 Sources of information should be listed and procedures for the transmission of information from the sources, together with the procedure for collecting and receiving it, should be set out in detail in the CAME or MOE as appropriate.
6.5.4.2 The type of information to be collected should be related to the objectives of the Programme and should be such that it enables both an overall broad based assessment of the information to be made and also allow for assessments to be made as to whether any reaction, both to trends and to individual events, is necessary. The following are examples of the normal prime sources: 
f. Pilots Reports.
Rev 0, dated 2nd March, 2010
134
Section 2  CAR M
g.  
Technical Logs.

h.  
Aircraft Maintenance Access Terminal  / On-board Maintenance System readouts.

i.  
Maintenance Worksheets. 

j.  
Workshop Reports. 

k.  
Reports on Functional Checks.

l.  
Reports on Special Inspections

m.
Stores Issues/Reports.

n.  
Air Safety Reports.

o.  
Reports on Technical Delays and Incidents.

p.  
Other sources: ETOPS, RVSM, CAT II/III.

6.5.4.3  In addition to the normal prime sources of information, due account should be taken of continuing airworthiness and safety information promulgated under CAR-21 
6.5.5 Display of information. 
Collected information may be displayed graphically or in a tabular format or a
combination of both. The rules governing any separation or discarding of information prior to incorporation into these formats should be stated. The format should be such that the identification of trends, specific highlights and related events would be readily apparent. 
6.5.5.1  The above display of information should include provisions for “nil returns” to aid the examination of the total information.  
6.5.5.2  Where “standards” or “alert levels” are included in the programme, the display of information should be oriented accordingly.  

6.5.6 Examination, analysis and interpretation of the information. 
The method employed for examining, analysing and interpreting the programme information should be explained. 
6.5.6.1  Examination.
Methods of examination of information may be varied according to the content and quantity of information of individual programmes. These can range from examination of the initial indication of performance variations to formalised detailed procedures at specific periods, and the methods should be fully described in the programme documentation. 
6.5.6.2  Analysis and Interpretation.
The procedures for analysis and interpretation of information should be such as to Rev 0, dated 2nd March, 2010
135
Section 2  CAR M
enable the performance of the items controlled by the programme to be measured; they should also facilitate recognition, diagnosis and recording of significant problems. The whole process should be such as to enable a critical assessment to be made of the effectiveness of the programme as a total activity. Such a process may involve:
　
中國(guó)航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS CAR -M(79)