曝光臺(tái) 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專(zhuān)營(yíng)店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

(d) (1) “Copter procedures” means helicopter procedures, with applicable minimums as prescribed
in §97.35 of this part. Helicopters may also use
other procedures prescribed in Subpart C of
this part and may use the Category A minimum
descent altitude (MDA) or decision height
(DH). The required visibility minimum may be
reduced to 1/2 the published visibility minimum, but in no case may it be reduced to less
than one-quarter mile or 1,200 feet RVR.
7-12
Figure 7-11. This COPTER ILS RWY 1 approach chart for Washington/Ronald Reagan National shows the DA for helicopters is 115
feet. The Category II DA for airplanes is 165 feet. The difference is due to the helicopter missed approach obstacle clearance surface (OCS) of 20:1, compared to the 40:1 OCS for airplanes. In this case, the missed approach must be started no later than the
point on the glidepath that the decision height (DH) is reached, in order to miss the Washington Monument.
as the OCS used to evaluate the airplane missed
approach segment. The helicopter climb gradient is
therefore required to be double that of the airplane’s
required missed approach climb gradient.
A minimum climb gradient of at least 400 feet per NM
is required unless a higher gradient is published on the
approach chart; e.g., a helicopter with a ground speed
of 70 knots is required to climb at a rate of 467 feet per
minute (FPM)
2
. The advantage of using the 20:1 OCS
for the helicopter missed approach segment instead of
the 40:1 OCS used for the airplane is that obstacles that
penetrate the 40:1 missed approach segment may not
have to be considered. The result is the DA/MDA may
be lower for helicopters than for other aircraft. The
minimum required climb gradient of 400 feet per NM
for the helicopter in a missed approach will provide 96
feet of required obstacle clearance (ROC) for each NM
of flight path.
Figure 7-12. Indianapolis Heliport Copter GPS 291°.
2
467 FPM = 70 KIAS x 400 feet per NM/60 seconds
7-13
7-14
HELICOPTER APPROACHES
TO VFR HELIPORTS
Helicopter approaches to VFR heliports are normally
developed either as public procedures to a point-inspace (PinS) that may serve more than one heliport or
as a Special procedure to a specific VFR heliport that
requires pilot training due to its unique characteristics.
These approaches can be developed using VOR or
ADF, but RNAV using GPS is the most common system used today. In the future, RNAV using the wide
area augmentation system (WAAS) offers the most
advantages because it can provide lower approach minimums, narrower route widths to support a network of
approaches, and may allow the heliport to be used as an
alternate. A majority of the special procedures to a specific VFR heliport are developed in support of helicop-
ter emergency medical services (HEMS) operators and
have a “Proceed Visually” segment between the MAP
and the heliport. Public procedures are developed as a
PinS approach with a “Proceed VFR” segment between
the MAP and the landing area. These PinS “Proceed
VFR” procedures specify a course and distance from
the MAP to the available heliports in the area.
APPROACH TO A POINT-IN-SPACE
The note associated with these procedures is: “PRO-
CEED VFR FROM (NAMED MAP) OR CONDUCT
THE SPECIFIED MISSED APPROACH.” They may
be developed as a special or public procedure where
the MAP is located more than 2 SM from the landing
site, the turn from the final approach to the visual segment is greater than 30 degrees, or the VFR segment
20:1 Versus 40:1 Obstacle Clearance Surface (OCS) for
Nonprecision Missed Approach Procedures
40:1 OCS
20:1 OCS
200' ft/NM (Standard)
400' ft/NM (Standard)
48' ft/NM
96' ft/NM
The Copter 20:1 OCS provides for a lower MDA for the helicopter than for the airplane.
A climb gradient of 400 ft/NM will allow a required obstacle clearance (ROC) of 96 ft/NM
for each NM of flight path.
MAP
Figure 7-13. Obstacle Clearance Surface.
Non-Mountainous Mountainous (14 CFR Part 95)
Cross Country
800-2
1000-3
1000-5
Local
500-1
500-2
800-3
Ceiling-visibility
Cross Country
800-3
1000-3
1000-5
Local
500-2
500-3
1000-3
Area
Condition
Day
Night – High Lighting
Conditions*
Night – Low Lighting
Conditions
Figure 7-14. Weather Minimums and Lighting Conditions for HEMS Operators.
7-15
from the MAP to the landing site has obstructions that
require pilot actions to avoid them. Figure 7-15 is an
　
中國(guó)航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Instrument Procedures Handbook (IPH)儀表程序手冊(cè)上(162)