The paragraph should also indicate by whom and how these data are analysed, what is the decision process to take action and what kind of action could be taken. This may include:
. amendment of the maintenance programme,
. amendment of maintenance or operational procedures,
. etc...)
1.6 Non-mandatory modification embodiment policy
(This paragraph should specify how the non-mandatory modification information are processed through the organisation, who is responsible for their assessment against the operator's/owner’s own need and operational experience, what are the main criteria for decision and who takes the decision of implementing [or not] a non-mandatory modification)
1.7 Major repair modification standards
(This paragraph should set out a procedure for the assessment of the approval status of any major modification before embodiment. This will include the assessment of the need of CAD or design organisation approval. It should also identify the type of approval required, and the procedure to follow to have a modification approved by CAD or design organisation.)
1.8 Defect reports
(a) Analysis
(This paragraph should explain how the defect reports provided by the contracted maintenance organisations are processed by the continuing airworthiness management organisation. Analysis should be conducted in order to give elements to activities such as maintenance programme evolution and non mandatory modification policy.)
(b) Liaison with manufacturers and regulatory authorities
(Where a defect report shows that such defect is likely to occur to other aircraft, a liaison should be established with the manufacturer and the certification authority, so that they may take all the necessary action.)
(c) Deferred defect policy
(Defects such as cracks and structural defect are not addressed in the MEL and CDL. However, it may be necessary in certain cases to defer the rectification of a defect. This paragraph should establish the procedure to be followed in order to be sure that the deferment of any defect will not lead to any safety concern. This will include appropriate liaison with the manufacturer.)
1.9 Engineering activity
(Where applicable, this paragraph should expose the scope of the organisation’s engineering activity in terms of approval of modification and repairs. It should set out a procedure for developing and submitting a modification/repair design for approval to CAD and include reference to the supporting documentation and forms used. It should identify the person in charge of accepting the design before submission to CAD.
Where the organisation has a DOA capability under MCAR- 21, it should be indicated here and the related manuals should be referred to.)
1.10 Reliability programmes
(This paragraph should explain appropriately the management of a reliability programme. It should at least address the following:
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：馬爾代夫民航法規 MCAR-M Continuing Airworthiness(109)
