d.
 Performance of organisational reviews: Each checklist item should be answered using an appropriate combination of: 

.
review of records, documentation, etc. 

.
sample check of aircraft under contract. 

.
interview of personnel involved.

.
review of discrepancies and difficulty internal reports (e.g., notified difficulties in using current procedures and tools, systematic deviations from procedures, etc.). 

.
review of complaints filed by customers. 

e.
 Management of findings and occurrence reports: 

.
All findings should be recorded and notified to the affected persons. 

.
All level 1 findings, in the sense of MCAR-M.716(a), should be immediately notified to CAD and all necessary actions on aircraft in service should be immediately taken. 

.
All occurrence reports should be reviewed with the aim for continuous improvement of the system by identifying possible corrective and preventive actions. This should be

done in order to find prior indicators (e.g., notified difficulties in using current procedures and tools, systematic deviations from procedures, unsafe behaviours, etc.), and dismissed alerts that, had they been recognised and appropriately managed before the event, could have resulted in the undesired event being prevented. 

.
Corrective and preventive actions should be approved by the person responsible for the organisational review programme and implemented within a specified time frame. 

.
Once the person responsible for the organisational review programme is satisfied that the corrective action is effective, closure of the finding should be recorded along with a summary of the corrective action. 

.
The accountable manager should be notified of all significant findings and, on a regular basis, of the global results of the organisational review programme. 

Following is a typical example of a simplified organisational review checklist, to be adapted as necessary to cover the CAME procedures:
1 – Scope of work
.
All aircraft under contract are covered in CAD Form 14. 

.
The scope of work in the CAME does not disagree with CAD Form 14. 

.
No work has been performed outside the scope of CAD Form 14 and the CAME. 

.
Is it justified to retain in the approved scope of work aircraft types for which the organisation has no longer aircraft under contract?

2 – Airworthiness situation of the fleet
. Does the continuing airworthiness status (AD, maintenance programme, life limited components, deferred maintenance, ARC validity) show any expired items? If so, are the aircraft grounded?
3 – Aircraft maintenance programme
.
Check that all revisions to the TC/STC holders Instructions for Continuing Airworthiness, since the last review, have been (or are planned to be) incorporated in the maintenance programme, unless otherwise approved by CAD. 

.
 Has the maintenance programme been revised to take into account all modifications or repairs impacting the maintenance programme?

.
Have all maintenance programme amendments been approved at the right level (CAD or indirect approval)?

.
Does the status of compliance with the maintenance programme reflect the latest approved maintenance programme?

.
Has the use of maintenance programme deviations and tolerances been properly managed and approved? 

4 – Airworthiness Directives (and other mandatory measures issued by CAD)
.
Have all ADs issued since the last review been incorporated into the AD status? 

.
Does the AD status correctly reflect the AD content: applicability, compliance date, periodicity…? (sample check on ADs) 
　
中國航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：馬爾代夫民航法規(guī) MCAR-M Continuing Airworthiness(124)