曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

1) ignition source prevention and 
2) flammability reduction, 
ii.  The major accidents related to fuel tank systems, the accident investigations and their conclusions, 
iii.  SFAR 88 of the FAA and JAA Interim Policy INT POL 25/12: ignition prevention program initiatives and goals, to identify unsafe conditions and to correct them, to systematically improve fuel tank maintenance), 
iv.  Explain briefly the concepts that are being used: the results of SFAR 88 of the FAA and JAA INT/POL 25/12: modifications, airworthiness limitations items and CDCCL, 
v.  Where relevant information can be found and how to use and interpret this information in the various instructions for continuing airworthiness (aircraft maintenance manuals, component maintenance manuals), 

vi.  Fuel Tank Safety during maintenance: fuel tank entry and exit procedures, clean working environment, what is meant by configuration control, wire separation, bonding of components etc,
vii.  Flammability reduction systems when installed: reason for their presence, their effects, the hazards of an Flammability Reduction System (FRS) using nitrogen for maintenance, safety precautions in maintenance/working with an FRS,
viii. Recording maintenance actions, recording measures and results of inspections.
The training should include a representative number of examples of defects and the associated repairs as required by the TC / STC holders maintenance data.
F) Approval of training
For MCAR-M Subpart G approved organisations the approval of the initial and continuation training programme and the content of the examination can be achieved by the change of the CAME exposition. The modification of the CAME should be approved as required by MCAR-M.
704(b). The necessary changes to the CAME to meet the content of this decision should be made and implemented at the time requested by CAD.
Appendix XIII to AMC M.712(f)
Organisational reviews may replace a full quality system in accordance with the provisions of MCAR-M.712(f) and AMC M.712(f) and as described in the continuing airworthiness management exposition (CAME)
Depending on the complexity of the small organisation (number and type of aircraft, number of different fleets, privilege to perform airworthiness reviews, etc.), the organisational review system may vary from a system using the principles and practices of a quality system (except for the requirement of independence) to a simplified system adapted to the low complexity of the organisation and the aircraft managed. 
As a core minimum, the organisational review system should have the following features, which should be described in the CAME: 
a. Identification of the person responsible for the organisational review programme: 
By default, this person should be the accountable manager, unless he delegates this responsibility to (one of) the MCAR-M.706(c) person(s). 
b. Identification and qualification criteria for the person(s) responsible for performing the organisational reviews:
These persons should have a thorough knowledge of the regulations and of the continuing airworthiness management organisation (CAMO) procedures. They should also have knowledge of audits, acquired through training or through experience (preferably as an auditor, but also possibly because they actively participated in several audits conducted by CAD).
c. Elaboration of the organisational review programme: 
.
Checklist(s) covering all items necessary to be satisfied that the organisation delivers a safe product and complies with the regulation. All procedures described in the CAME should be addressed.

.
A schedule for the accomplishment of the checklist items. Each item should be checked at least every 12 months. The organisation may choose to conduct one full review annually or to conduct several partial reviews.
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：馬爾代夫民航法規 MCAR-M Continuing Airworthiness(123)