曝光臺(tái) 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營(yíng)店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費(fèi)者

60
70
80
Request
Volunteer
Provide
Repeat
Pass
Ask for Repeat
Acknowledge
Seek clarification
Standard Terminology
Non-standard
General Discussion
Ask for Quiet
Communication
Mean Frequency Per Hour
Without BCSS
With BCSS
Figure 14. Hypothetical comparison of communication in OPS cell with and without BCSS
8.4 Collecting Data in Army HQ During Military Exercises
While the methodology does appear to offer a viable method of collecting data in the
field, it is important that appropriate processes are followed to generate the data. The
following summarises the steps that should be followed to collect team and task data
DSTO-TR-1034
31
in army HQ. It should be noted that these instructions act as a guide to experienced
observers, who would then train the naive observers in the techniques.
Before arriving at the exercise or operation, it is vital that the research objective is
clearly established. This will ensure that the steps that need to be followed during
the exercise are directed, and maximum use is made of attendance. In the current
case, the main objective would be to map out team and task processes in the HQ. On
Day 1 of attendance, the analysts should become familiar with the surroundings and
the personnel within the HQ. It is also important that the subjects do not perceive the
observers as obtrusive or threatening in any way. Clear explanations need to be
provided in terms of the purpose of the observations.
Once familiarisation is complete, Day 2 should be spent determining data collection
techniques. This involves identifying the different cells present in the HQ (eg. INT,
OPS, LOG, etc.), mapping out the physical layout (including all of the equipment),
and listing the key duties that the personnel perform. Once this is complete, the
analysts should determine observable actions, and code the actions into categories
and higher order factors. Data sheets can then be modified to suit, and then tested by
spending 1-2 hours observing HQ. If problems are apparent, revisions should be
made, and the sheets should be retested.
At the completion of this process, any other observers must be familiarised with the
categories and coding system. Multiple observers should then perform a test session
and conduct an inter-observer reliability test to ensure that all concerned are
competent with the process. Days 3-5 of attendance should then be dedicated to
observation.
8.5 Conclusions
In summary, this report suggests that adopting a formal approach to the collection of
observational data on team and task performance from Army HQ will substantially
contribute to our understanding and enhancement of military team processes. In
particular, it provides an objective method of identifying existing team processes as
well as the impact of digitised systems on performance. A strength of this approach
is that it can be applied at any level of HQ (Bde to Coy), and at different intensities
and tempos. It also provides indices of performance that can be correlated with
other outcome measures, as well as implications for command support system
design based on functional accounts of behaviour.
9. Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the personnel of 10/27 Regiment for their participation in
data collection during Exercise Rhino Charge 2000. We would also like to
acknowledge Major Chris Roe for his cooperation and assistance in providing access
to the exercise. It proved to be a most valuable opportunity to test the preliminary
assessment of the methodology. From LOD, DSTO, we would like to acknowledge
Mr Fred Bowden for his important feedback during the writing process, and Mr Sam
Huf and Mr Peter Williams for their valuable contribution during the exercise.
DSTO-TR-1034
32
10. References
Altman, J (1974). Observational study of behavior. Behaviour, 49, 227-267.
Bakeman, R. (1978). Untangling streams of behavior: Sequential analysis of
behavioural data. In G. P. Sackett (Ed.). Observing Behavior, vol. 2, Data Collection
and Analysis Methods (pp. 63-78). Baltimore: University Park Press.
Bowden, F., Gaertner,. P & Williams, P. (2000). A Near Real-Time Tactical Land C4I
Assessment Capability, Paper published in the Proceedings of the Fifth
International Conference on Simulation Technology and Training (SimTecT00),
Sydney, Australia, February 2000, 291-296.
Bowers, C. A., Baker, D. P. & Salas, E. (1994). Measuring the importance of
teamwork: The reliability and validity of job/task analysis indices for teamtraining
design. Military Psychology, 6(4), 205-214.
Bowers, C., Thornton, C., Braun, C., Morgan, B. B., & Salas, E. (1998). Automation,
　
中國(guó)航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：航空資料30(20)