曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

The sense of international responsibility that the United Nations ascribedto itself had reached a heady stage at this point, where the role of international law in international human conduct was perceived to be primary and above the authority of States. In its Report to the GeneralAssembly, the International Law Commission recommended a draft provision which required:
Every State has the duty to conduct its relations with other States in accordance with
international law and with the principle that the sovereignty of each State is subject to the
supremacy of international law.483
This principle, which forms a cornerstone of international conduct by States, provides the basis for strengthening international comity and regulating the conduct of States both internally – within their territories – and externally, towards other
479See Dempsey(2003, pp. 118–119).
480In Re. Chorzow Factory (Jurisdiction) Case, (1927) PCIJ, Ser. A, no. 9 at 21.
481ICJ Reports (1949),4 at 23.
482Christol(1991, p. 231).

483Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of the 1st Session, A/CN.4/13, 9 June 1949, at 21.
States. States are effectively precluded by this principle of pursuing their own interests untrammelled and with disregard to principles established by international law.
These obligations are erga omnes affecting all States and thus cannot be made inapplicable to a State or group of States by an exclusive clause in a treaty or other document re.ecting legal obligations without the consent of the international community as a whole. Besides, holding governments responsible will ensure proper quality control in the provision of air navigation services.
References
Abeyratne RIR (1992) The development of the machine readable passport and visa and the legal
rights of the data subject. Annals of Air and Space Law 17(Part II):1–31 Abeyratne RIR (1998) Aviation and regulatory issues. Ashgate, London Abeyratne RIR (1999) Mental injury caused in accidents during international air carriage – a point
of view. The Aviation Quarterly 1999(4):193–205 Abeyratne RIR (2000) Mental distress in aviation claims – emergent trends. Journal of Air Law
and Commerce 65(2):225–261 Abeyratne RIR (2001a) Aviation trends in the new millennium. Ashgate, London Abeyratne RIR (2001b) The exchange of airline passenger information – issues of privacy.
Communication Law 6(5):153–162
Abeyratne RIR (2002a) Attacks on America – privacy implications of heightened security measures in the United States, Europe, and Canada. Journal of Air Law and Commerce 67 (1):83–115
Abeyratne RIR (2002b) Intellectual property rights and privacy issues: the aviation experience in API and biometric identi.cation. Journal of World Intellectual Property 5(4):631–650 Abeyratne RIR (2003) Pro.ling of passengers at airports – imperatives and discretions. European Transport Law 38(3):297–311 Abeyratne RIR (2006) Theoretical justi.cation for modernizing the Rome Convention of 1952. Annals of Air and Space Law 31:185–212 Becker T (2006) Terrorism and the state: rethinking the rules of state responsibility. Hart Mono-
graphs in Transnational and International Law. Hart, Portland, OR BrownlieI(1990) Principles of public international law, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford Cheng B (1962) The law of international air transport. Oceania, London Christol CQ (1991) Space law past, present and future. Kluwer Law and Taxation, Deventer Crawford J (2002) The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Intro-
duction, Text and Commentaries. Cambridge University press, Cambridge Dempsey PS (2003) Privatization of the air: governmental liability for privatized air traf.c
services. Annals of Air and Space Law 27:118–119 Heitmeyer R (2000) Biometric ID and airport facilitation. Airport World (ACI) 5(1):18–20 Honig JP (1956) The legal status of aircraft. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague Kaiser SA (1995) Infrastructure, airspace and automation – air navigation issues for the twenty-
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Aviation Security Law 航空安全法(132)