曝光臺 注意防騙 網曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

Interference with civil aviation should be viewed as an extortion oriented act committed against the international order and world peace and which is calculated to take advantage of the most susceptible human quality of seeking personal security as a priority. The offence is an immediate threat to world peace and should be treated with the utmost care. It is needless to say that any nation which views the offence differently encourages world discord. Any wilful act calculated to endanger the safety of an aircraft, its passengers or any aviation related property should be collectively regarded as an offence against the safety of air travel.
As for the need for a more .exible approach to the extradition of offenders the establishment and recognition of a universal offence against the safety of aircraft would almost automatically nurture mutual cooperation between nations. Often, if an offender imputes politics to the offence committed by him, he is granted political, asylum by the host nation merely because the latter sympathises with the alleged motive for the offence as represented by the offender. Once this takes place it no longer remains the commission of an offence universally condemned but becomes an altercation between nations on political beliefs and convictions.
References
Abramovsky A (1974) The Hague Convention. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 3(3):89 Abramovsky A (1975a) The Montreal Convention. Columbia Journal of International Law 14
(2):278 Abramovsky A (1975b) Multilateral Convention for the suppression of unlawful seizure and
interference with aircraft. Part II of the Montreal Convention. Columbia Journal of Transna-
tional Law 14:300 Boyle RP (1964) The Tokyo Convention on offenses and certain other acts committed on board
aircraft. Journal of Air Law and Commerce 30:305–328 Boyle RP (1972) International action to combat aircraft hijacking. Lawyers of the Americas
4:460–473
Brosche H (1974) The Arab oil embargo and the United States pressures against Chile. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 7:3
Chung DY (1976) Some legal aspects of aircraft hijacking in international law. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee
Costello D (1975) International terrorism and the development of the principle Aut Dedere Aut Judicare. Journal of International Law and Economics 10:483
Evans AE (1969) Hijacking: its cause and cure. The American Journal of International Law 63:708
Feller SZ (1972) Comment on criminal jurisdiction over aircraft hijacking. Israel Law Review
7:212 Fingerman ME (1980) Skyjacking and the Bonn Declaration of 1978: sanctions applicable to recalcitrant nations. California Western International Law Journal 10:142 Fitzgerald GF (1971) Toward legal suppression of acts against civil aviation. International Conciliation 585:42–78 Hudson MO (1941) International legislation, vol VII. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC Kunz JL (1948) The inter-American treaty of reciprocal assistance. The American Journal of
International Law 42:111
Lauterpact H (1950) International law and human rights. Stevens & Sons, London
Mankiewicz RH (1971) The 1970 Hague Convention. Journal of Air Law and Commerce 37(2):201
Margo RD (1989) Aviation insurance, 2nd edn. Butterworths, London
McWhinneyE(1987) Aerial piracy and international terrorism, the illegal diversion of aircraft and international law, 2nd revised edn. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht
Mendelsohn AI (1967) In .ight crime, the international and domestic picture under the Tokyo Convention. Virginia Law Review 53:509
Milde M (1986) Interception of civil aviation vs. misuse of civil aviation (background of Amendment 27 to Annex 2). Annals of Air and Space Law 11:122
Milde M (1990) Draft convention on the marking of explosives. Annals of Air and Space Law 15:155–179
OppenheimL (1958) International law, vol1, 8th edn. Longmans, Green& Co., London
　
中國航空網 www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：Aviation Security Law 航空安全法(193)