曝光臺 注意防騙 網(wǎng)曝天貓店富美金盛家居專營店坑蒙拐騙欺詐消費者

(IEEE) 22nd Digital Avionics Systems
Conference, Indianapolis, Ind., U.S.,
Oct. 12-16, 2003.
30. Chandra, Divya C.; Mangold, Susan
J. Human Factors Considerations in the
Design and Evaluation of Electronic Flight
Bags (EFBs), Version 1: Basic Functions.
Final Revision, Report no. DOT-VNTSCFAA-
00-22. Cambridge, Mass., U.S.: U.S.
DOT Volpe National Transportation Systems
Center. Sept. 28, 2000.
31. Chandra, Divya C. et al.
32. Nicholson, Jonathan J. E-mail communication
with Werfelman, Linda. June
17, 2005; June 20, 2005. Flight Safety
Foundation, Alexandria, Va., U.S.
33. Chandra, Divya C. et al.
34. Ibid.
35. Ibid.
36. Chandra, Divya C.; Yeh, Michelle;
Riley, Vic. Designing a Tool to Assess
the Usability of Electronic Flight Bags
(EFBs), Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-04/38.
Cambridge, Mass., U.S.: U.S. DOT Volpe
National Transportation Systems Center.
2004.
37. Yeh and Chandra.
38. Chandra, Divya C. et al.
39. Jeppesen.
40. Chandra, Divya. “A Tool for Structured
Evaluation of Electronic Flight Bag
Usability.”
Reprinted with permission from Flight
Safety Foundation, Flight Safety Digest,
June 2005.
© Impulse Software Limited 2005 i 02/12/09
Worldwide Airfield Manual
Disclaimer
The information contained within this manual has been obtained from a variety of sources. As such,
the information accurately represents, in edited form, material such obtained. Impulse Software
Limited shall not be liable for, and the user hereby indemnifies Impulse Software Limited, against
any damages or losses in respect of incorrect information obtained from any third party.
Coverage of Aerodromes
All civil airports are included, but with the following provisos:
Civil airports with short runways (<1600m) and/or Military airports are not included, except in areas
where airports are sparse. In the USA there are literally hundreds of airports with adequate length
runways. To include every single one would make the maps less useful, so the criteria to include
only US airports with customs, and/or with 24 hour opening. Again, in an area where these criteria
are impossible to fulfil, any large airport would be used.
© Impulse Software Limited 2005 ii 02/12/09
Key to Maps
Aerodrome markers Symbols within aerodrome markers
Single Runway, Open 24 Hours 3 Airport with Cat 3 ILS available
2 Non Independent Runways, Open 24 Hours 2 Airport with Cat 2 ILS available
2 or more Independent Runways, Open 24 Hours 1 Airport with Cat 1 ILS available
Single Runway, Not Open 24 Hours V Airport with VOR Approach available
2 Non Independent Runways, Not open 24 Hours  Airport with NDB Approach available
2 or more Independent Runways, Not open 24 Hours L Airport with Localiser Approach available
Military Airport, Single Runway, Not open 24 Hrs R Airport with RNAV Approach available
Military Airport, Single Runway, Open 24 Hrs P Airport with PAR Approach available
Military Airport, 2 Non Independent Runways, Open 24 Hours G Airport with GPS Approach available
Map Symbols not associated with Airports
12
Adjoining Page o
En-Route Navigation Aid - VOR/DME or NDB
145 Minimum Safe Altitude Town without major airport
25 Distance in nm between two airports ▌ Airway (Africa and Asia maps only)
Reporting Point
Where ILS category for an aerodrome is given, ie Cat 1, 2 or 3, this is the category as promulgated by the relevant state authority.
However, the usable category by specific aircraft types may be more restrictive. Consult aircraft performance manuals.
Back-up Aerodrome Charts carried on Long Haul aircraft are arranged in 3 groups: LHR 767 and 777GE; LHR 777RR and 747; LGW
777 GE. There are also regional trip kits for LHR Long Haul aircraft.
Airport Labels
EICK
CRK 114.60
ICAO Airport Code and airfield beacon
LFQQ
LEQ 109.0
Use email link to request expanded key
EGGD
BR I 414
Use email link to request expanded key
Use email link to request expanded key
Use email link to request expanded key
Use email link to request expanded key
Use email link to request expanded key
Use email link to request expanded key
Use email link to request expanded key
PACVL
GCR 404
ICAO Airport Code. L signifies low strength runway, based on not able to support 767 at Max Ldg Wt.
PAKNX
AKN 112.8
ICAO Airport Code. X signifies runway bearing strength not known.
GQNCU ICAO Airport Code. U signifies runway is unpaved.
HAGON ICAO Airport Code. N signifies runway width is less than 45m. For actual width see table
CYJPG
XYP 112.9
　
中國航空網(wǎng) www.k6050.com
航空翻譯 www.aviation.cn
本文鏈接地址：航空資料15(39)